The framework is shaped and challenged by a panel of specialists.
A product that measures inclusion should be able to show how its own method is checked. This page sets out who reviews it, what they can change, and what is written down.
The model
How specialists help shape the method
Includology's Steering Group provides challenge to how we measure. It brings together expertise across organisational psychology, accessibility and inclusive practice, AI ethics, and frontline social work, so the method is tested by people who work with these questions in the real world.
A panel of specialists reviews the framework and method.
Panel review
The framework, question set, and scoring approach are reviewed by the Steering Group before they are used with organisations. Review happens on the method itself, not on individual organisations' results.
Recorded decisions
Reviews and changes are documented, so the method stays traceable over time. If the method changes, the reasoning is recorded.
Scope of oversight
What the Steering Group looks at
- How AI is used in the platform
- How the platform and framework are shaped as they develop
- The Includology Guidance Library and the evidence behind it
- Accessibility and fairness
- Data protection and privacy
What it does not touch
- Individual organisations' results, which the panel is not given access to.
- Identifiable employee responses. Contributions are anonymised and grouped, never attributed.
- Commercial terms and founding cohort places, which sit with Includology.
The same discipline in the product
Recorded reasoning is how the Adjustment Log works too.
Measured openly, challenged properly.
Founding cohort places are open now. Enquire to find out more.